This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van der Dennen, J. M. G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Review Essay: The Murderer Next Door: Why the Mind is Designed to Kill

University of Groningen, the Netherlands

Buss postulates that the human mind has developed adaptations for killing (killing or homicide modules), that murder is qualitatively different from all other forms of violence, and that homicidal ideation (fantasies) almost invariably precedes carried-out kills, and he claims that Daly & Wilson’s slip-up argument fails because premeditated mate (spouse, partner) killing cannot result from the mere slip-ups central to the by-product (of ever more desperate strategies of mate guarding) hypothesis. In this review a number of alternative interpretations are presented: Normal distribution and coincidental status striving theory, special taxon of substrate dysfunctions, phylogenetic regression theory, and overcontrol theory. Finally, the problematic mate-killing module (as allegedly "superior" to the by-product theory) and the obscure role of homicidal ideation are critically assessed.

Key Words: evolutionary psychology • killing module • mate killings • slip-up or by-product theory • adaptations to kill

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?